Neat Image community Forum Index
www.neatimage.com
Neat Image community
support - help - questions and answers - sharing experience and opinions - feedback - suggestions - backup contact
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Question about profiles

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Neat Image community Forum Index -> Device noise profiles
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
jani



Joined: 02 Aug 2009
Posts: 17
Location: Saronida, Greece

PostPosted: Tue Dec 08, 2009 7:57 pm    Post subject: Question about profiles Reply with quote

Hello i am actually making a set for the Olympus e-420 which isn't allready fully listed (only raw) i have aquestion to better understand the profiling:

1. i make a profile with a target for example,
the auto profiler chooses a place in the right upper corner on a bright square, and i save this the filesize is 38KB or sometimes 40KB (quality 94%)
2. now i just move the selector to a darker place at the same target, and re-scann it, and saved it as a new Profile (quality also 94%)
the filesize is 42 KB.
questions:
1.where is the difference exept the filesize and why?
2.are bigger or smaller filesizes "better" or dont care?
_________________
greets from greece
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
NITeam



Joined: 01 Feb 2003
Posts: 2871

PostPosted: Wed Dec 09, 2009 12:32 am    Post subject: Re: Question about profiles Reply with quote

jani wrote:
1. i make a profile with a target for example,
the auto profiler chooses a place in the right upper corner on a bright square
Do you use Auto Profile with Regular Image or Auto Profile with Calibration Target (please see in the Profile menu)?

jani wrote:
1.where is the difference exept the filesize and why?
2.are bigger or smaller filesizes "better" or dont care?

The difference is in the noise sample you used for main analysis.
The file size is not important. What is important with the Calibration Target is to use the correct square for main analysis. When you use Auto Profile with Calibration Target, it usually automatically selects the right square.

Vlad
_________________
Neat Image team
noise reduction for images: www.neatimage.com | noise reduction for video: www.neatvideo.com
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
jani



Joined: 02 Aug 2009
Posts: 17
Location: Saronida, Greece

PostPosted: Wed Dec 09, 2009 7:23 pm    Post subject: Re: Question about profiles Reply with quote

NITeam wrote:
Do you use Auto Profile with Regular Image or Auto Profile with Calibration Target (please see in the Profile menu)?

In this example i mean i used the Caliration Target.
But i use also regular images if they produce high quality Profiles.
That happens for example in images with low deph field sharpness, where are sharp and unsharp parts in the image.

NITeam wrote:

The difference is in the noise sample you used for main analysis.
The file size is not important. What is important with the Calibration Target is to use the correct square for main analysis. When you use Auto Profile with Calibration Target, it usually automatically selects the right square.

Do you mean with "right square" , the square with the best profile quality?
Yes i use first the Auto Profile function, and then i check 2-5 other places in the Calibration Target if there are better results. Sometimes i get better results when i check the squares by hand (at about 20% of all Calibration Targets)
_________________
greets from greece
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
NITeam



Joined: 01 Feb 2003
Posts: 2871

PostPosted: Wed Dec 09, 2009 7:29 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Please open the Profile menu and find two different types of Auto Profile there: Auto Profile with Regular Image or Auto Profile with Calibration Target. I was referring to those two different functions.

Vlad
_________________
Neat Image team
noise reduction for images: www.neatimage.com | noise reduction for video: www.neatvideo.com
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
jani



Joined: 02 Aug 2009
Posts: 17
Location: Saronida, Greece

PostPosted: Thu Dec 10, 2009 11:44 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

oh, i found it i used always the function "auto profile with regular image",
when i made the profile with calibration targets, is that very bad?
_________________
greets from greece
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
NITeam



Joined: 01 Feb 2003
Posts: 2871

PostPosted: Thu Dec 10, 2009 11:55 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Not very, but could be much better if Auto Profile with Calibration Target was used as suggested by the procedure described in the user guide. My recommendation - please closely follow that procedure when building profile sets.

Thank you,
Vlad
_________________
Neat Image team
noise reduction for images: www.neatimage.com | noise reduction for video: www.neatvideo.com
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
jani



Joined: 02 Aug 2009
Posts: 17
Location: Saronida, Greece

PostPosted: Thu Dec 10, 2009 5:23 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I have readed the documentation before, but had forgotten that detail.
In the documentation is written a profile quality higher than 75% is good,
i aim a quality of 91%-100% (usually 93-96%), so thats no the problem i used "auto profile with regular image" on calibration targets.
In the future i remember to use "auto profile with calibration target".
_________________
greets from greece
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
jani



Joined: 02 Aug 2009
Posts: 17
Location: Saronida, Greece

PostPosted: Thu Dec 10, 2009 6:00 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

i have calculatet that to make profile for every thinkable set i could produce about 29700 Profiles, because each factor multiplies the possibilities.
For example
5 different Iso settings,
about 33 shutterspeeds (under 1sec),
9 White-balance Settings,
5 Image Sizes
4 De-Noise-Filer settings

offcourse thats too much, even for me Wink
but it is theoretical a fact.Idea

I have another question which i didn't find in the user guide,
how many Profiles are needed or good for a profile set?
and how many for a very good profile set?

usually it varies by 15-60 files i saw by the profiles i downloaded.

So is it possible when i make a set of about 290-350 profiles to publish it?
(offcourse no dubs)
Where is the upper maximum (2000?)
_________________
greets from greece
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
NITeam



Joined: 01 Feb 2003
Posts: 2871

PostPosted: Thu Dec 10, 2009 7:03 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The user guide contains a table that includes several noise-related parameters listed in the order of their significance. The user guide suggests to select some of those parameters starting from the top and build profiles for each combination. When selecting profiles to be included in this variable set you can decide how many profiles overall you can build and which combinations are really important for you, which ones you actually use. There is absolutely no need to profile all possible combinations.

For some examples of good profile sets please check the online library of profiles on Neat Image website. All of those profiles were built by Neat Image users who followed the recommendations of the user guide.

Thank you,
Vlad
_________________
Neat Image team
noise reduction for images: www.neatimage.com | noise reduction for video: www.neatvideo.com
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Neat Image community Forum Index -> Device noise profiles All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group