| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
rlaws2
Joined: 09 Dec 2008 Posts: 2
|
Posted: Tue Dec 09, 2008 7:53 pm Post subject: New 5D mark ii profiles |
|
|
i just received my new 5D and will be anxiously awaiting the new profiles for this camera! anyone using it yet?  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
azlerader
Joined: 07 Feb 2009 Posts: 5
|
Posted: Sat Feb 07, 2009 6:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I have a Canon 5DII, downloaded the NI calibration images yesterday and took photographs of them from ISO 100 to ISO 6400.
I will be building a set of profiles for testing the new 64-bit NI plug-in with Photoshop CS4 16-bit images.
My goal will be to determine if NI still does a better job at noise reduction than CS4's native noise reduction routines.
I do not believe anyone has done that yet... I will report my findings here. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
rlaws2
Joined: 09 Dec 2008 Posts: 2
|
Posted: Sat Feb 07, 2009 8:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| great! i am not going to be using the 64 bit version as i am using mac but would welcome the basic profiles. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
azlerader
Joined: 07 Feb 2009 Posts: 5
|
Posted: Sun Feb 08, 2009 1:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I finished creating camera profiles for the 5DII for all ISO values from 100 to 6400 made from a printed NI calibration chart that I photographed in RAW. There are 19 profiles in all.
The images were converted and opened in CS4 in colorspace ProPhoto RGB and as 16-bits.
I have the profiles zipped and you are certainly welcomed to them but I am uncertain of their value to you given that you are using a different plug-in from the one I generated mine.
Email me at azleader@yahoo.com if you would like me to send them anyway.
Here is what I know so far:
1- 64-bit NI outperforms CS4's native noise reduction routines.
2- In pure default mode 64-bit NI does a visibly better job at noise reduction than CS4.
3- 64-bit NI runs 7+ times faster than CS4. CS4 is dog slow!
4- The 5DII has noise at every ISO level that benefits from NI.
These conclusions are based only on runs I made against the idealized NI charts and not against "real world" images. I don't really expect there to be much difference but that is a test I have yet to perform.
I might also add that the amount of noise at low ISO levels for the 5DII is quite low, but that there is enough that I could see minor improvements when NI is applied while being viewed at 100% crop. Most of the time, though, in practice you probably will not need to run NI against ISO images below 800 or 1000. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
azlerader
Joined: 07 Feb 2009 Posts: 5
|
Posted: Mon Feb 09, 2009 7:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
To let folks know...
I finished a set of 5DII camera profiles for RAW and JPG that work with 64-bit and 32-bit NI plug-ins that I have confirmed will soon be added to the profiles download page. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|