NeatImage and AstroPhotos...

questions about practical use of Neat Image
Post Reply
beruberu
Posts: 63
Joined: Wed Oct 22, 2003 4:25 pm
Contact:

NeatImage and AstroPhotos...

Post by beruberu »

Hello,

I would like to thanks NeatImage for this great soft...

You can have a look how it improves my image of M42 (Orion Nebula) at http://astrosurf.com/skylover/transit/M42/ you will see the picture before and after!! What a difference !!!!!!!!

For the details of the picture have a look at http://astrosurf.com/skylover/

THanks again..... :wink: :wink: :wink:
Best Greatings from Switzerland.
Phil
http://www.focusnature.ch
http://astrosurf.com/skylover/
NITeam
Posts: 3173
Joined: Sat Feb 01, 2003 4:43 pm
Contact:

Post by NITeam »

Thank you! A very nice image you show. :)

Just be careful, you may get too much load on your webserver if you post the images in BMP format.

Thank you!
Vlad
TechMage89
Posts: 6
Joined: Sun Feb 06, 2005 7:20 pm

Post by TechMage89 »

Take mercy on those with dialup internet!

Post images in JPEG!
beruberu
Posts: 63
Joined: Wed Oct 22, 2003 4:25 pm
Contact:

Post by beruberu »

TechMage89 wrote:Take mercy on those with dialup internet!

Post images in JPEG!
Jpg is not good...... Yes bmp is heavier, but it is why I put a link to my website...

:wink:
Best Greatings from Switzerland.
Phil
http://www.focusnature.ch
http://astrosurf.com/skylover/
greenboy
Posts: 8
Joined: Thu Jan 27, 2005 5:29 pm

Post by greenboy »

At least try compressed PNG - not lossy. Not as small as JPG, but can be quite a bit smaller than BMP. I use the ALL filtering option which almost always results in the smallest filesize. I've also had good luck with the lossless JPEG2000 - though that requires that a viewer have a JPEG2K plugin for their browser of choice (I've used Morgan's for both Firefox/Netscape, and Internut Exploiter.
<-- greenboy ---<<<<
Post Reply